P: So Jim asked us to have a conversation about the P.G. Wodehouse novels for this series on classics. Hon grew up on those books (mostly listening to them narrated by the brilliant Martin Jarvis). I’m less of a fan. We had a lot of fun disagreeing…
I’ve always had a suspicion that part of the reason you and your dad are so in love with the P.G. Wodehouse books is so you can speak in code and exclude me.
H: Er…that’s a tiny bit neurotic (but having in-jokes with someone else who loves the same books is always good fun). You’re just prejudiced against these books. You should take time to read them – I think you’d love them. How can anyone not want to read a book called ‘Aunts aren’t Gentlemen’?
P: Then what is the main reason you love them?
H: The language, Wodehouse was a genius with words. I am deeply in love with his similes.
Secretaries (even better, the Efficient Baxter) ‘falling like gentle rain from heaven upon the lobelias below’
‘Aunt..calling to Aunt like mastodons bellowing across primeval swamps’
Honoria Glossop’s laugh ‘…like a squadron of cavalry charging over a tin bridge’
I could go on.
P: Aren’t they super dated comedies of manners about a long gone class system?
H: Not really, no. There is very little direct commentary about class – it’s very much a made up world - and in any meaningful hierarchy Jeeves definitely comes out top. And if you’re going to start ruling out books on the basis that their subject matter involves the stuff of history you’re going to lose a lot of good reads… Anyway I love a good comedy of manners. It’s hard to be funny; Wodehouse was exceptionally funny.
P: But aren’t the plots all the same?
H: Well I don’t think plot always has to be the most important thing in a novel but I have to admit there’s something in that. Plot devices like Wooster rewarding Jeeves by disposing of some offending piece of clothing or Jeeves coming to Wooster’s rescue when he’s got himself in yet another disastrous romantic entanglement do feature pretty regularly in that series....
P: Exactly, there’s always the stock ‘disastrous girlfriend’ character. And didn’t he just keep churning them out?
H: That’s not fair. His characters aren’t stock characters. There is a long list of disastrously unsuitable girlfriends but they’re unsuitable in a very different ways. You couldn’t mix up Madeleine Bassett (‘The stars are God’s daisychain’) with Florence Craye (‘unable to see a male soul without wanting to get behind it and shove’)! Wodehouse plays on character types but develops them perfectly. And look at how brilliantly differentiated and well developed are the voices of Jeeves and Wooster.
And as for ‘churning them out’ Wodehouse produced consistently funny and successful novels for decades – I think that’s the dream!
P: You have a point there…
Waiting for Callback is published by Simon & Schuster on 28 January 2016.
If you enjoy reading classics, or if you want to read more, why not join the fantastic Classics Challenge hosted by my friend Stacey over at Pretty Books? It's a great way to find other classics lovers, discuss books, and get and give recommendations. Check out this post and don't miss the hashtag
|(c) David Locke, London 2015|
|(c) Becka Moor, 2015|
Perdita: I used to be the least numerate tax barrister ever to practise at the English bar but now I'm writing at last and it's the best 'job' in the world - not least because I'm writing funny teen books with my daughter.
Honor: I'm 17, I'm in my last year at school doing A levels and yes, weirdly, I'm co-writing funny teen books with my mum and having so much fun with it. I used to do a bit of acting (mostly school but a tiny bit professional) and although Elektra, our main character, is nothing like me, I suppose that's where the germ of the idea for Waiting for Callback came from.
Facebook: Waiting for Callback (not ‘activated’ yet)
Good Reads: waiting for callback
Post a Comment